CLAT 2020: HC dismisses plea for law exam from home – Times of India

CLAT 2020: HC dismisses plea for law exam from home - Times of India
NEW DELHI: The risk of home exams being compromised or manipulated by members or teaching centres can’t be dominated out, the Delhi High Court has stated whereas dismissing a plea that candidates be allowed to take Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2020 from their houses as a substitute of exams centres because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The court docket stated the issue of accessibility for 78,000 candidates to acceptable know-how, web connection, laptop computer or desktop pc could be uncertain and the plea for home exam can’t be accepted.

The CLAT-2020 examination, to be held on August 22 earlier, will now be carried out on September 28.

Justice Jayant Nath stated it’s clear that the pleas of the petitioner are misplaced and can’t be a floor for suspending the exams or change of mode to conduct the exam.

“I may also note that the petitioner (V Govinda Ramanan) has completed his LLB in 2016. It is now after a gap of 4 years that he seeks to apply for a post graduation in law. The petitioner has hence waited for four years to give the exam. There is no merit in the present petition. The same is dismissed,” the decide stated.

While the order was handed on September 10, it was made accessible on the court docket web site on Wednesday.

The petition was filed by the petitioner in search of an acceptable path to quash the CLAT- 2020 examination notification issued by the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLU) in as far as it mandates the petitioner to bodily go to the examination centre and provides the exam.

CLAT is a centralised exam for admissions to bachelors and masters programs in law in 22 NLUs within the nation and is carried out by the consortium.

Under the CLAT 2020 notification, the exam could be held on-line at notified centres the place computer systems could be arrange for candidates to entry the check.

The petitioner, who’s a law graduate and needs to pursue his LLM, stated he suffered from bronchial asthma and falls underneath the weak class of people who’re suggested by the federal government to not go outdoors within the current time of COVID-19 pandemic.

The consortium informed the court docket that the choice to conduct CLAT-2020 at bodily check centres was challenged by means of Public Interest Litigation earlier than the Supreme Court which has dismissed it.

The excessive court docket stated, “Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is clear that the aforesaid order (of Supreme Court) would remain binding on this court.”

“Even in any other case, it’s clear that the plea of respondent no.1 (consortium) {that a} home-based exam is probably not acceptable for roughly 78,000 candidates who’re to take the exam. The risk of the exams being compromised or manipulated by the members/teaching facilities can’t be dominated out.

“That apart, the problem of accessibility for 78,000 candidates to appropriate technology, internet connection, laptop or desktop computer itself would be doubtful. Hence this plea of the petitioner cannot be accepted.” the excessive court docket stated.

!operate(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=operate(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.model=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, doc,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2009952072561098’);
fbq(‘observe’, ‘PageView’);

Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply