Players’ representative in top council tells Board: kept in dark on key issues

sourav ganguly, ganguly, sourav ganguly ipl, sourav ganguly bcci,
Written by Devendra Pandey
| Mumbai |

October 14, 2020 4:39:30 am

sourav ganguly, ganguly, sourav ganguly ipl, sourav ganguly bcci,
Currently, former India captain Ganguly, Shah and Dhumal are among the many BCCI office-bearers on the Council.

THE INDIAN cricket board is going through questions from a gamers’ representative in the Apex Council, which was arrange by the Supreme Court to supervise the sport, over insufficient communication, apathy in addressing welfare calls for and failure to share minutes of conferences held over two months, The Indian Express has learnt. Sources mentioned that in an e-mail despatched days earlier than the Council’s subsequent assembly Saturday, former India opener Anshuman Gaekwad additionally questioned the dearth of IPL invites for all its members. At the identical time, he wrote, it was “eye-pleasing” to see the BCCI’s office-bearers in the UAE watching the IPL.

A BCCI office-bearer confirmed to The Indian Express that the Board has obtained Gaekwad’s mail. Gaekwad, who represents the Indian Cricketers’ Association (ICA) on the Council together with former girls’s captain Shantha Rangaswamy, didn’t reply to cellphone calls and textual content messages looking for remark. In his e-mail, Gaekwad wrote that BCCI office-bearers haven’t replied to letters despatched by the ICA.

When contacted, ICA president and former Test batsman Ashok Malhotra mentioned: “We have written thrice to BCCI president Sourav Ganguly, secretary Jay Shah and treasurer Arun Dhumal but are yet to get a reply. There are some demands that we want the Board to consider, like increasing pension, raising medical insurance from Rs 5 lakh to Rs 10 lakh, and giving pension to widows of first-class cricketers. We want pension for players who have played 10-24 first-class games. So far, no decision has been taken on any of these issues and there has been no reply to our mails.”

The ICA has additionally requested for launch of the benevolent fund of former India all-rounder Manoj Prabhakar, who returned to the sport as a coach after a ban on alleged match-fixing fees. Malhotra mentioned the ICA’s two representatives are “following up” on these issues.

Based on Justice R M Lodha’s suggestions, which subsequently grew to become a part of a Supreme Court order, the Apex Council contains BCCI office-bearers, a state unit nominee, ladies and men gamers’ representatives, and a nominee of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).

Currently, former India captain Ganguly, Shah and Dhumal are among the many BCCI office-bearers on the Council.

BCCI sources mentioned Gaekwad’s e-mail has raised “very pertinent points” concerning the lack of transparency in cricket administration and signifies how Ganguly’s presence “hasn’t really empowered the players”.

In his mail, Gaekwad mentioned he’s conscious that BCCI office-bearers have the “mandate to take day-to-day decisions”, and concerning the pressures they face whereas taking essential calls concerning the IPL and different cricket engagements.

However, he wrote that by conserving the Apex Council in the dark, the office-bearers have put its members in an embarrassing scenario, particularly when the media, state items and cricketers ask them about key issues.

The former Baroda participant, who represented the nation in 40 Tests and 15 ODIs in the 1970s and 1980s, mentioned that because the gamers’ representatives had been elected by over 1,500 cricketers, and never simply by the state items, they’ve a duty to maintain them knowledgeable about issues associated to their welfare.

The members’ ignorance doesn’t paint an excellent impression concerning the functioning of the Council, wrote Gaekwad.

© The Indian Express (P) Ltd

Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*